我们将TCL 40R 5G置于我们严格的DXOMARK电池测试基准来衡量它在续航、充电和效率方面的表现。在这些测试结果中,我们将分析它在各种测试和几种常见的使用情况下的表现。
概述
主要规格:
- 电池容量: 5000毫安时
- 15W 充电器 (不包括)
- 6.6英寸, 720 x 1612, 90 Hz, LCD显示屏
- 联发科 Dimensity 700 (7 纳米)
- 测试的 ROM / RAM 组合: 64 GB + 4 GB
TCL 40R 5G
123
battery
164
Honor X7b
Best: Honor X7b (221)
119
Samsung Galaxy M51
Best: Samsung Galaxy M51 (195)
134
Samsung Galaxy M51
Best: Samsung Galaxy M51 (198)
84
Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
Best: Realme GT Neo 5 (240W) (224)
101
Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
Best: Realme GT Neo 5 (240W) (212)
106
Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro
Best: Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro (205)
141
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Best: Apple iPhone 14 Pro (194)
关键性能
These key points are derived from the lab measurements during testing and do not figure into the overall score. The lab measurements, however, are used for the overall score.
2h27 autonomy
after 5-minute charge
全球排行榜中位置

87
名
6. Honor Magic6 Lite (5800 mAh)
156
14. Honor Magic6 Lite (5300 mAh)
150
15. Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
147
24. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
142
34. Samsung Galaxy A15 LTE
137
35. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
136
35. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
136
45. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
134
45. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
134
49. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
133
49. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
133
49. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G
133
56. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
132
56. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
132
64. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
130
64. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
130
66. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
129
66. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
129
66. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
129
66. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
129
75. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
127
84. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
125
92. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
121
92. Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
121
95. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
120
95. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
120
102. Motorola Edge 20 Pro
118
102. Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro
118
107. Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
117
107. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13
117
115. Crosscall Stellar-X5
115
119. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
114
119. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G
114
124. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
113
128. Motorola Moto G62 5G
112
132. Motorola Moto G9 Power
111
132. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
111
132. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
111
138. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
109
138. Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos)
109
142. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)
108
146. Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
107
146. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
107
148. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
106
152. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
103
155. Motorola moto g34 5G
102
159. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
101
159. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
101
161. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)
100
161. Xiaomi Redmi 10 2022
100
166. Apple iPhone 13 mini
99
166. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
99
166. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
99
171. Motorola Edge 30 Pro
98
171. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
98
175. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
96
178. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
95
178. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
95
178. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
95
183. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
94
185. Apple iPhone 12 mini
93
185. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
93
188. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
92
189. Motorola moto g54 5G
90
189. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
90
195. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
84
197. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
82
201. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
75
排行榜中位置

30
名
3. Honor Magic6 Lite (5800 mAh)
156
6. Honor Magic6 Lite (5300 mAh)
150
10. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
136
15. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
134
16. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G
133
19. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
132
22. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
129
22. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
129
22. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
129
29. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
125
32. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
120
32. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
120
39. Motorola Moto G9 Power
111
41. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
101
42. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
96
44. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
94
优点
- 总体上续航良好,中度使用时达 2.5 天以上
- 通话和游戏时续航不错
- 通话时放电电流小
- 每晚损失不到 1% 电量
不足
- 完全充电需 2 小时 44 分钟,时间较长
- 快速充电 5 分钟后所获增续航时间短
- 户外移动表现较弱
- 使用摄像头和导航时放电电流较大
TCL 40R 5G 总体得分非常好,排在我们电池数据库中的前半部分。
中度使用下,TCL 40R 5G 的续航达 2.5 天以上。在典型使用场景测试下,以及在评估室内单独用例时,其续航表现非常好。该设备夜间平均每晚损失不到 1% 电量。不过,40R 5G 在户外续航上的表现参差不一,它在使用摄像头和导航时低于平均水平,但在通话方面却表现出色。
TCL 40R 5G 配备 15W 小功率充电器,充电体验欠佳。其完全充电需 2.5 小时以上,在快速充电 5 分钟后所获增续航时长较短。
该设备的充电效率较差,在拔下设备时其充电器本身的残余消耗量很高。在典型使用场景测试下,其放电电流非常小,通话和播放在线视频或音乐方面也是如此。但在户外测试单个用例时,放电电流较大,这意味着该设备在优化上仍有改善空间。
与同为中高端机型(200-399 美元)的设备相比,TCL 40R 5G 的排名低于平均水平。它在室内测试下续航良好,效率得分也处于平均水平。但其充电得分,在同价位机型中来说是较低的
测试摘要
关于DXOMARK电池测试:为了在我们的智能手机电池评测中进行分析和评分,DXOMARK工程师在室内和户外进行了为期一周的各种客观测试。(关于我们智能手机电池基准的更多细节,请阅读我们电池基准介绍和我们如何测试电池体验。)
以下部分集合了我们在DXOMARK实验室进行的详尽测试和分析的主要内容。根据需求,我们可以提供更详细的性能评估报告。您可以 与我们联系。
|
Battery |
Charger |
Wireless |
Display |
Processor |
TCL 40R 5G |
5000mAh |
15W (not included) |
- |
LCD 720 x 1612 |
MediaTek Dimensity 700 |
Oppo A78 5G |
5000mAh |
33W (included) |
- |
LCD 720 x 1612 |
Mediatek Dimensity 700 |
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G |
5000mAh |
25W (not included) |
- |
OLED 1080 x 2340 |
MediaTek Dimensity 1080 |
续航
147
Honor Magic7 Lite
Honor Magic7 Lite
电池续航分数是如何构成的
续航分数由三个子分数构成:室内静态,户外移动,和校准模式。每个测试项目的分数均包含全面的测试结果,以衡量各种现实生活场景中的电池续航能力。
98h
Light Usage
Active: 2h30/day
65h
Moderate Usage
Active: 4h/day
39h
Intense Usage
Active: 7h/day
全球排行榜中位置
Battery Life (moderate)

47
名
10. Samsung Galaxy A15 LTE
78h
11. Honor Magic6 Lite (5800 mAh)
77h
13. Honor Magic6 Lite (5300 mAh)
77h
21. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G
72h
29. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
70h
33. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
69h
34. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
69h
36. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
69h
38. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
68h
40. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
67h
41. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
67h
42. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
67h
48. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
65h
50. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
65h
53. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
64h
59. Motorola Moto G9 Power
64h
62. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
62h
63. Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
62h
64. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
62h
65. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
61h
68. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
60h
87. Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
57h
94. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
56h
96. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
56h
97. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
56h
99. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
55h
100. Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
55h
110. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
54h
111. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
54h
115. Motorola moto g54 5G
53h
117. Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro
53h
123. Motorola Edge 20 Pro
52h
134. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G
51h
138. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
51h
139. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
50h
145. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)
50h
147. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
49h
148. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
49h
153. Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos)
49h
155. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
49h
156. Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
49h
157. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
49h
158. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
49h
160. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
48h
162. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
48h
165. Motorola Edge 30 Pro
47h
166. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
47h
167. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
47h
168. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
47h
170. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
46h
171. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)
46h
173. Nubia RedMagic 6 Pro
46h
178. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
44h
181. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
43h
183. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
43h
184. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
42h
186. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
41h
188. Apple iPhone 13 mini
41h
189. Apple iPhone 12 mini
40h
191. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
40h
192. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
39h
195. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
38h
198. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
37h
200. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
35h
排行榜中位置
Battery Life (moderate)

21
st
5. Honor Magic6 Lite (5800 mAh)
77h
7. Honor Magic6 Lite (5300 mAh)
77h
12. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G
72h
14. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
70h
16. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
69h
17. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
67h
18. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
67h
22. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
65h
24. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
64h
28. Motorola Moto G9 Power
64h
30. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
62h
31. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
62h
35. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
56h
41. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
50h
43. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
49h
45. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
47h
法拉第笼中的机器人模拟用户的一系列触屏动作,我们将其称为“典型使用场景”,包括打电话,在线视频观看等,时常为16小时,其中4小时为活跃状态,8小时为休眠状态。机器人每日重复相同动作,直至电池电力耗光。
Typical Usage Scenario discharge curves
119
Samsung Galaxy M51
Samsung Galaxy M51
在户外移动时使用智能手机,因为额外的“隐性”需求,续航会降低,比如持续发射信号以选择蜂窝网络。DXOMARK电池专家将手机带到户外,进行一组精确预设的活动操作,每一部设备都遵循同样的三小时移动路线(步行、乘坐公共汽车、地铁......)
Autonomy for on the go use cases (full charge)
134
Samsung Galaxy M51
Samsung Galaxy M51
为完成此类测试,手机会重返法拉第笼,我们的机器人会重复进行一组规定的活动操作(使用场景),比如游戏,使用流媒体等。从80%的电量开始,所有设备都要进行测试,直到它们耗尽至少5%的电池电量。
Autonomy for calibrated use cases (full charge)
充电
92
Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
电池充电分数是如何构成的
充电是整个电池体验的一部分。在一些续航较低的情况下,知道你能以多快的速度为手机充电极为重要。DXOMARK电池充电分数由两个子分数组成,(1)完全充电(2)快速充电
84
Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
完全充电评估的是电池需要多长时间能从0% 充到 80% ,从 80%充到 100%;同时测量电池需要多长时间和多少电才能从图标显示100%到真正的完全充电。
全球排行榜中位置
Charging Time 0-80%

185
名
1. Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
0h08
24. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
0h22
31. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G
0h24
32. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
0h24
37. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
0h26
59. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
0h31
65. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
0h33
75. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
0h37
76. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
0h37
80. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
0h38
81. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
0h38
84. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
0h39
85. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
0h40
86. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
0h40
93. Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos)
0h42
99. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
0h44
102. Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
0h46
103. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
0h46
104. Honor Magic6 Lite (5300 mAh)
0h47
108. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
0h48
109. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)
0h48
110. Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos)
0h49
111. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)
0h49
113. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
0h49
114. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
0h49
117. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
0h49
119. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
0h50
121. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
0h51
122. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
0h51
123. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
0h51
125. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
0h51
125. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
0h51
127. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
0h51
128. Apple iPhone 12 mini
0h52
129. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
0h52
130. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
0h52
132. Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
0h52
133. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
0h52
135. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
0h53
136. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
0h53
139. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G
0h54
139. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
0h54
141. Samsung Galaxy A15 LTE
0h54
142. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
0h54
143. Apple iPhone 15 Plus
0h54
144. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
0h55
145. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
0h56
146. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
0h56
147. Honor Magic6 Lite (5800 mAh)
0h56
149. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
0h57
150. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
0h57
151. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
0h57
152. Apple iPhone 13 mini
0h57
153. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
0h57
159. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
1h01
163. Apple iPhone 14 Plus
1h03
169. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
1h06
175. Motorola moto g34 5G
1h12
177. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
1h15
180. Crosscall Stellar-X5
1h20
183. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
1h22
186. Xiaomi Redmi 10 2022
1h25
188. Motorola Moto G62 5G
1h26
189. Motorola moto g54 5G
1h26
190. Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
1h28
191. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
1h30
198. Motorola Moto G9 Power
1h53
排行榜中位置
Charging Time 0-80%

40
名
5. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
0h31
6. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G
0h33
8. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
0h38
15. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
0h44
17. Honor Magic6 Lite (5300 mAh)
0h47
19. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
0h49
22. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
0h51
24. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
0h51
26. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
0h53
27. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G
0h54
27. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
0h54
29. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
0h55
30. Honor Magic6 Lite (5800 mAh)
0h56
38. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
1h22
43. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
1h30
45. Motorola Moto G9 Power
1h53
Power consumption and battery level during full charge
有线和无线的充电曲线(如果有的话),显示了电池电量指示器的变化,以及在向全容量充电阶段的功率消耗(瓦特)。
充满电的时间图分解了达到80%、100%和充满电的必要时间
101
Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
在手机处于不同的充电水平(20%、40%、60%、80%)时,快速提升测试测量了电池在插入5分钟后的充电量。这里的图表比较了5分钟快速充电的平均续航力增益。
Average autonomy gain for a 5 minute charge (wired)
效率
128
Oppo Reno6 5G
Oppo Reno6 5G
How Efficiency score is composed
The DXOMARK power efficiency score consists of two sub-scores, Charge up and Discharge rate, both of which combine data obtained during robot-based typical usage scenario, calibrated tests and charging evaluation, taking into consideration the device’s battery capacity. DXOMARK calculate the annual power consumption of the product, shown on below graph, which is representative of the overall efficiency during a charge and when in use.
Annual Consumption TCL 40R 5G
4.1 kWh
Efficient
Good
Bad
Inefficient
106
Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro
Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro
The charge up sub-score is a combination of four factors: the overall efficiency of a full charge, related to how much energy you need to fill up the battery compared to the energy that the battery can provide; the efficiency of the travel adapter when it comes to transferring power from an outlet to your phone; the residual consumption when your phone is fully charged and still plugged into the charger; and the residual consumption of the charger itself, when the smartphone is disconnected from it. The chart here below shows the overall efficiency of a full charge in %.
Overall charge efficiency
141
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
The discharge subscore rates the speed of a battery’s discharge during a test, which is independent of the battery’s capacity. It is the ratio of a battery’s capacity divided by its autonomy. A small-capacity battery could have the same autonomy as a large-capacity battery, indicating that the device is well-optimized, with a low discharge rate.
Average discharge current