荣耀 Magic6 Pro 在 DXOMARK Camera 测试中表现出色,在我们的排名中名列第一,领先于华为 Mate 60 Pro+、Oppo Find X7 Ultra 或苹果 iPhone 15 Pro Max 等重量级设备。它在几乎所有测试领域都取得了出色的成绩,没有露出真正的弱点,比其前身 Magic5 Pro 也有了显着的改进。
在照片方面,Magic6 Pro 与华为 Mate 60 Pro+ 并列最高分,即使在棘手的逆光场景中也能呈现出漂亮的色彩、极佳的动态范围和良好的面部对比度。此外,自动对焦系统是它的一个主要优势,在所有条件下都能准确、快速地对焦。一如一些制造商,荣耀在 Magic6 Pro 上安装了可变光圈,但 f/1.4-2.0 光圈范围不如华为 Mate 60 Pro+ 和小米 14 Ultra 那样宽广,两者的光圈范围都是 f/1.4-4.0。尽管如此,与没有此功能的设备(例如 Oppo Find X7 Ultra (112))相比,该荣耀手机在集体照中提供了明显更大的景深,图像噪点也得到了很好的控制,但 Magic6 Pro 在细节方面仍略落后于表现最好的手机,这主要是因为面部纹理呈现不自然。
在默认的 HDR 模式下,视频效果非常好,尤其是在演色性方面,在所有测试条件下都能产生自然宜人的色彩。然而,由于曝光、防抖和自动对焦得分较低,该荣耀手机仍然略微落后于同类领先的视频设备 iPhone 15 Pro Max。
色彩是该荣耀手机在录制视频时的一大优势。白平衡和演色性非常自然,在变化的光线条件下色彩转换流畅而快速,考虑到 Magic6 Pro 是首款具有 HDR 视频模式的荣耀设备,这一点尤其令人印象深刻。该手机的曝光良好,动态范围宽广,因此画面的亮部和暗部都有良好的细节。然而,与 iPhone 15 Pro Max 不同的是,我们的测试人员还注意到一些曝光不稳定的情况。视频纹理和降噪之间的权衡还不错,但该荣耀手机无法达到 iPhone 那样高的水平,与 Oppo Find X7 Ultra 相比之下尤其如此。我们的测试人员对该荣耀手机在良好光线下的视频防抖性能印象深刻,但在低光下录制时,他们注意到视频的帧之间存在一些清晰度差异。视频自动对焦效果很好,但有些轻微的不稳定,因此对整体体验产生了负面影响。
请注意,Magic6 Pro 的摄像头配备了荣耀全新的 AI 动作感应系统,该系统旨在捕捉运动场景中最值得关注的时刻,特别是在运动场景中。然而,该系统在默认情况下并未激活,因此不在本次测试的范围内。
荣耀 Magic6 Pro – 鲜艳的色彩和准确的肤色
BEST 154
Top score Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
人像
为朋友和家人拍照和录制视频时,Magic6 Pro 是一款出色的设备。对焦是衡量此用例的一个关键标准,该荣耀手机在这一属性上表现得非常好,其宽广的景深使得集体合照中的所有拍摄对象都能够清晰对焦,此外,它的自动对焦准确且非常快速,可以在移动场景中捕捉决定性的瞬间。此外,该手机也可以拍出宜人的色彩和良好的曝光,因此可以在最佳方式下呈现拍摄对象。美中不足的是,我们的测试人员在一些低光场景中注意到细节呈现不自然,并且出现运动模糊。
荣耀 Magic6 Pro – 动态范围宽广,色彩与肤色都不错
BEST 138
Top score Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
低光拍摄
噪点管理是低光拍摄的关键要素,荣耀 Magic6 Pro 在这方面表现极佳。此外,该摄像头在大多数条件下(包括低光场景)拍摄的图像都具有宽广的动态范围、准确的测标曝光和良好的演色性。美中不足的是,拍摄对象细节在低光下可能较少,或者看起来不自然。我们的测试人员在非常昏暗的光线下也注意到 HDR 有些不稳定。
荣耀 Magic6 Pro – 动态范围宽广,演色性良好,细节佳
测试摘要
关于DXOMARK摄像头测试:在 DXOMARK 进行 Camera 评鉴时,我们在实验室和现实生活情境中拍摄各种各样的主题,然后根据客观测试和感知测试来进行评分。进行客观测试时,我们使用实验室环境中的测量软件直接计算测试结果;感知测试则是由一群图像专家根据一套复杂的度量标准,就需要人为判断的图像质量进行各个方面的比较。智能手机测试需要一个由工程师和技术员组成的团队进行大约一周的测试。他们分别对照片、变焦和视频质量进行评分,然后将这些分数合并为总分,以便在不同手机的摄像头之间进行比较。关于DXOMARK摄像头基准的更多信息,请点击这里。关于智能手机摄像头得分的更多细节,请点击这里。以下部分集合了我们在DXOMARK实验室进行的详尽测试和分析的主要内容。根据需求,我们可以提供更详细的性能评估报告。您可以与我们联系。
Edge acutance irregularity and average shooting delay along all tested conditions
This graph illustrates focus irregularity and speed as well as zero shutter lag capability, for different light conditions. Each point is the result of the aggregation of the measurements for a group of 30 pictures per conditions. The y-axis shows the average acutance difference with the best focus in percentage. The lower the better. On the x-axis, a negative delay means the photo is taken just before the user triggers the shutter, a positive delay means the photo is taken just after. The closer to 0 ms, the better. Acutance and delay are measured respectively using the Dead leaves chart and the LED Universal Timer, on the AF HDR Setup.
Autofocus irregularity and speed: 20Lux Δ7EV Tungsten Handheld
This graph illustrates focus accuracy and speed and also zero shutter lag capability by showing the edge acutance versus the shooting time measured on the AFHDR setup on a series of pictures. All pictures were taken at 20Lux with Tungsten illuminant, 500ms after the defocus. On this scenario, the backlit panels in the scene are set up to simulate a fairly high dynamic range: the luminance ratio between the brightest point and a 18% reflective gray patch is 7, which we denote by a Exposure Value difference of 7. The edge acutance is measured on the four edges of the Dead Leaves chart, and the shooting time is measured on the LED Universal Timer.
在我们的纹理测试中,该摄像头摄入了丰富的细节,尤其是在日光下拍摄时,但难以与同类产品中的佼佼者(例如华为 Mate 60 Pro+、苹果 iPhone 15 Pro Max 或 Oppo Find X7 Ultra)相媲美。值得批评的要点在于该荣耀手机的面部细节呈现不自然。
荣耀 Magic6 Pro - 细节
荣耀 Magic6 Pro – 面部细节的分布不均匀
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score vs lux levels for tripod and handheld conditions
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with the level of lux, for two holding conditions. DMC detail preservation score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate texture and details rendering on a selection of crops of our DXOMARK chart.
Visual noise evolution with illuminance levels in handheld condition
This graph shows the evolution of visual noise metric with the level of lux in handheld condition. The visual noise metric is the mean of visual noise measurement on all patches of the Dead Leaves chart in the AFHDR setup. DXOMARK visual noise measurement is derived from ISO15739 standard.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.
在视频模式下,荣耀 Magic6 Pro 的改进比前代 Magic5 Pro 更为显著,但 Magic6 Pro 无法与同类最佳手机苹果 iPhone 15 Pro 和 Oppo Find X7 Ultra 相媲美。该荣耀手机提供了大致非常好的视频体验,色彩很好,色彩转换也不错。此外,曝光在大多数测试条件下准确而稳定。
在视频模式下,荣耀 Magic6 Pro 在纹理保留和降噪之间取得了良好的平衡,但略落后于 Oppo Find X7 Ultra。
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation video score vs lux levels
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation video score with the level of lux in video. DMC detail preservation score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate texture and details rendering on a selection of crops of our DXOMARK chart.
Spatial visual noise evolution with the illuminance level
This graph shows the evolution of spatial visual noise with the level of lux. Spatial visual noise is measured on the visual noise chart in the video noise setup. DXOMARK visual noise measurement is derived from ISO15739 standard.
Temporal visual noise evolution with the illuminance level
This graph shows the evolution of temporal visual noise with the level of lux. Temporal visual noise is measured on the visual noise chart in the video noise setup.