关于DXOMARK摄像头测试：在 DXOMARK 进行 Camera 评鉴时，我们在实验室和现实生活情境中拍摄各种各样的主题，然后根据客观测试和感知测试来进行评分。进行客观测试时，我们使用实验室环境中的测量软件直接计算测试结果；感知测试则是由一群图像专家根据一套复杂的度量标准，就需要人为判断的图像质量进行各个方面的比较。智能手机测试需要一个由工程师和技术员组成的团队进行大约一周的测试。他们分别对照片、变焦和视频质量进行评分，然后将这些分数合并为总分，以便在不同手机的摄像头之间进行比较。关于DXOMARK摄像头基准的更多信息，请点击这里。关于智能手机摄像头得分的更多细节，请点击这里。以下部分集合了我们在DXOMARK实验室进行的详尽测试和分析的主要内容。根据需求，我们可以提供更详细的性能评估报告。您可以与我们联系。
Edge acutance irregularity and average shooting delay along all tested conditions
This graph illustrates focus irregularity and speed as well as zero shutter lag capability, for different light conditions. Each point is the result of the aggregation of the measurements for a group of 30 pictures per conditions. The y-axis shows the average acutance difference with the best focus in percentage. The lower the better. On the x-axis, a negative delay means the photo is taken just before the user triggers the shutter, a positive delay means the photo is taken just after. The closer to 0 ms, the better. Acutance and delay are measured respectively using the Dead leaves chart and the LED Universal Timer, on the AF HDR Setup.
Autofocus irregularity and speed: 5Lux Δ0EV Tungsten Tripod
This graph illustrates focus accuracy and speed and also zero shutter lag capability by showing the edge acutance versus the shooting time measured on the AFHDR setup on a series of pictures. All pictures were taken at 5Lux with Tungsten illuminant, 500ms after the defocus. The edge acutance is measured on the four edges of the Dead Leaves chart, and the shooting time is measured on the LED Universal Timer.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score vs lux levels for tripod and handheld conditions
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with the level of lux, for two holding conditions. DMC detail preservation score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate texture and details rendering on a selection of crops of our DXOMARK chart.
在噪点测试中，我们分析在现实生活中和在实验室图片上拍摄的图像噪点的各种属性，例如强度、色度、颗粒和结构。就自然图像而言，我们特别注意面部、风景以及阴暗区域和高动态范围条件下的噪点。我们也会评鉴自然图像中的运动物体上的噪点。我们在 1 到 1000 勒克斯之间的各种照明条件以及不同类型的动态范围条件下对着图片进行拍摄，并对所拍摄的图像进行客观测量。我们使用枯叶图并进行标准化的测量，例如源自 ISO 15739 的视觉噪点。
Visual noise evolution with illuminance levels in handheld condition
This graph shows the evolution of visual noise metric with the level of lux in handheld condition. The visual noise metric is the mean of visual noise measurement on all patches of the Dead Leaves chart in the AFHDR setup. DXOMARK visual noise measurement is derived from ISO15739 standard.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.
华为 Mate 60 Pro+ 配备 HLG HDR 视频模式（HDR Vivid），提供了最佳整体结果，因此我们在视频测试中激活了此模式。P60 Pro 和 iPhone 15 Pro Max 两款对比设备也都在 HDR 模式下进行了测试。总体而言，Mate 60 Pro+ 无法与同类最佳的 iPhone 15 Pro Max 和谷歌 Pixel 8 Pro 相媲美，但在视频录制方面仍然是迄今测试过的最佳智能手机之一。
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation video score vs lux levels
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation video score with the level of lux in video. DMC detail preservation score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate texture and details rendering on a selection of crops of our DXOMARK chart.
Spatial visual noise evolution with the illuminance level
This graph shows the evolution of spatial visual noise with the level of lux. Spatial visual noise is measured on the visual noise chart in the video noise setup. DXOMARK visual noise measurement is derived from ISO15739 standard.
Temporal visual noise evolution with the illuminance level
This graph shows the evolution of temporal visual noise with the level of lux. Temporal visual noise is measured on the visual noise chart in the video noise setup.
English
中文
4名
