苹果 iPhone 14 Pro Max 和 iPhone 14 Pro 的后置摄像头享有相同规格,并使用相同的 A16 仿生处理器,不出所料,测试之后的苹果 iPhone 14 Pro Max 的摄像头结果与 iPhone14 Pro 完全相同。
我们包含了测试中的一些样张,以显示这两个机型之间的相似之处。但如果您要更深入地了解 iPhone 14 Pro Max 后置摄像头的拍照和视频性能,请转往 iPhone 14 Pro 查看它的完整测试结果。
概述
主要摄像头规格:
- 主摄像头:4800万像素传感器,24毫米等效f/1.78光圈镜头,第二代传感器移位OIS,双像素AF
- 超广角。1200万像素传感器,13毫米等效f/2.2光圈镜头,双像素AF
- 远摄:1200万像素传感器,77毫米等效f/2.8光圈镜头,OIS
- 带有杜比视界的HDR视频录制
- A16仿生芯片组
评分
包含了总分及子分数和属性

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
146
camera
用例&拍摄条件
用例的分数表明产品在特定情况下的表现。它们不包括在总分的计算中。
户外拍摄
明亮光线下 (≥1000 勒克斯)拍摄照片和视频
室内拍摄
明亮光线下 (≥1000 勒克斯)拍摄照片和视频
低光拍摄
低光条件下(100 勒克斯以下)拍摄照片和视频
人像
人像和团体照片及视频
Position in Global Ranking
5名
1. Honor Magic5 Pro
152
2. Huawei Mate 50 Pro
149
3. Google Pixel 7 Pro
147
3. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
147
5. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
146
5. Apple iPhone 14 Pro
146
7. Huawei P50 Pro
143
8. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
141
8. Apple iPhone 13 Pro
141
8. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
141
11. Google Pixel 7
140
11. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon)
140
11. Vivo X90 Pro+
140
14. Huawei Mate 40 Pro+
139
15. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
137
16. Vivo X90 Pro
136
16. Xiaomi 13 Pro
136
16. Xiaomi 12S Ultra
136
19. Huawei Mate 40 Pro
135
19. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
135
19. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
135
22. Google Pixel 6 Pro
134
22. Vivo X70 Pro+
134
24. Apple iPhone 14 Plus
133
24. Apple iPhone 14
133
24. Samsung Galaxy S23 Plus (Snapdragon)
133
24. Samsung Galaxy S23 (Snapdragon)
133
28. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
131
28. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
131
30. Oppo Find X5 Pro
130
30. Xiaomi 13
130
32. Huawei P40 Pro
129
32. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
129
32. Xiaomi 12T Pro
129
32. Xiaomi 12 Pro
129
36. Oppo Find X3 Pro
128
37. Apple iPhone 12 Pro
127
37. Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders
127
39. Google Pixel 6
126
39. Honor Magic4 Pro
126
39. Vivo X70 Pro (MediaTek)
126
39. Vivo X60 Pro+
126
43. Apple iPhone 13 mini
125
43. Apple iPhone 13
125
43. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
125
43. Vivo X50 Pro+
125
47. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
124
47. Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro
124
49. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
122
49. Google Pixel 6a
122
49. OnePlus 10 Pro
122
49. OnePlus 9 Pro
122
53. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
120
53. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
120
55. Sony Xperia 5 IV
119
56. Sony Xperia 1 IV
118
57. Apple iPhone 12
117
57. Apple iPhone 12 mini
117
57. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
117
57. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
117
57. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)
117
62. Apple iPhone 11
116
62. Asus Zenfone 8
116
62. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
116
65. Honor 70
115
65. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Snapdragon)
115
65. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
115
65. Xiaomi 12T
115
69. Nothing Phone(1)
114
69. OnePlus Nord 2T 5G
114
69. Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G
114
69. Oppo Find X5
114
73. OnePlus 8 Pro
113
73. Xiaomi 12
113
75. Oppo Reno8 5G
112
75. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
112
77. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
111
77. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Exynos)
111
77. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)
111
80. Google Pixel 5
109
80. Xiaomi 12 Lite 5G
109
82. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Exynos)
108
82. Xiaomi 11T Pro
108
84. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
107
85. Oppo Find X3 Neo
106
86. Sony Xperia 1 III
105
87. Huawei P40
102
88. Black Shark 5 Pro
101
88. Motorola Edge 30 Pro
101
90. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
100
90. Google Pixel 4a
100
92. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra
96
93. Oppo Find X5 Lite
95
94. Oppo Reno4 5G
94
95. Oppo A94 5G
93
95. Vivo X80 Lite 5G
93
97. Samsung Galaxy A72
92
97. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
92
99. Oppo Reno6 5G
89
100. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
88
100. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
88
102. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
85
103. OnePlus Nord CE 5G
84
104. Vivo Y76 5G
83
105. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
79
106. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
78
107. Realme 9i 5G
75
108. Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
74
109. Oppo A78 5G
70
109. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
70
111. Fairphone 4
69
112. Motorola Moto G62 5G
66
113. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G
65
114. Oppo Reno8 Lite 5G
64
115. Sony Xperia 10 IV
63
116. Honor X7
61
116. Honor Magic4 Lite 5G
61
118. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
60
119. Oppo A77 5G
53
120. Honor X8 5G
52
121. Xiaomi Redmi 10 2022
51
122. Crosscall Action-X5
50
123. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
48
124. Crosscall Core-Z5
47
125. Oppo A57
46
125. Oppo A16s 5G
46
Position in Ultra-Premium Ranking
5名
1. Honor Magic5 Pro
152
2. Huawei Mate 50 Pro
149
3. Google Pixel 7 Pro
147
3. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
147
5. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
146
5. Apple iPhone 14 Pro
146
7. Huawei P50 Pro
143
8. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
141
8. Apple iPhone 13 Pro
141
8. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
141
11. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon)
140
11. Vivo X90 Pro+
140
13. Huawei Mate 40 Pro+
139
14. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
137
15. Vivo X90 Pro
136
15. Xiaomi 13 Pro
136
15. Xiaomi 12S Ultra
136
18. Huawei Mate 40 Pro
135
18. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
135
18. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
135
21. Google Pixel 6 Pro
134
21. Vivo X70 Pro+
134
23. Apple iPhone 14 Plus
133
23. Samsung Galaxy S23 Plus (Snapdragon)
133
25. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
131
25. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
131
27. Oppo Find X5 Pro
130
28. Huawei P40 Pro
129
28. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
129
28. Xiaomi 12 Pro
129
31. Oppo Find X3 Pro
128
32. Apple iPhone 12 Pro
127
32. Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders
127
34. Honor Magic4 Pro
126
34. Vivo X60 Pro+
126
36. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
125
36. Vivo X50 Pro+
125
38. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
124
38. Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro
124
40. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
122
40. OnePlus 10 Pro
122
40. OnePlus 9 Pro
122
43. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
120
44. Sony Xperia 5 IV
119
45. Sony Xperia 1 IV
118
46. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
117
47. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Snapdragon)
115
47. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
115
49. Oppo Find X5
114
50. OnePlus 8 Pro
113
51. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
112
52. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
111
52. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Exynos)
111
54. Sony Xperia 1 III
105
优点
- 照片和视频色彩鲜艳悦目,肤色准确
- 照片和视频的动态范围宽广,对比度极佳
- 照片和视频中细节丰富
- 照片和视频自动对焦极佳
- 散景模拟效果宜人,面部细节非常好
- 在近距和中距上可连续进行高质量的照片和视频变焦
- 出色的视频防抖
不足
- 天空中偶尔出现亮部剪切
- 室内照片中出现亮度噪点
- 在混合照明下拍摄的照片偶尔会出现白平衡色偏
- 照片和视频中的被摄体周围的振铃效应
照片
143
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
154
Honor Magic5 Pro

苹果 iPhone 14 Pro Max

苹果 iPhone 14 Pro
Autofocus irregularity and speed: 20Lux Δ0EV Tungsten Handheld
This graph illustrates focus accuracy and speed and also zero shutter lag capability by showing the edge acutance versus the shooting time measured on the AFHDR setup on a series of pictures. All pictures were taken at 20Lux with Tungsten illuminant, 500ms after the defocus. The edge acutance is measured on the four edges of the Dead Leaves chart, and the shooting time is measured on the LED Universal Timer.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score vs lux levels for tripod and handheld conditions
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with the level of lux, for two holding conditions. DMC detail preservation score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate texture and details rendering on a selection of crops of our DXOMARK chart.
变焦
139
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
156
Honor Magic5 Pro
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.
DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation video score vs lux levels
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation video score with the level of lux in video. DMC detail preservation score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate texture and details rendering on a selection of crops of our DXOMARK chart.